Clearly drones are flying into mainstream. There was a torrent of news stories last week surrounding the launch of the DJI Phantom 4, and several WSJ articles talked about how drone investments have not delivered to their full potential. As an early stage investor looking at this sector, this “Drone Girl” (as I was also called this week at South by Southwest), was thinking about making sense of these headlines. Let’s examine consumer and commercial (with exception of 3M’s media, military and municipal) usage.
The Phantom 4 is a quad copter drone released by China’s DJI Technologies. Currently, DJI claims 70 percent of the $2 billion drone market, having shipped an impressive 700,000 drones last year alone.
Retailing for $1,399 — the price of a GoPro plus an iPad — the DJI Phantom 4 boasts a slew of features that make the quad copter easier to fly and much harder to crash. The key is autonomous flight with increased computer vision. The drone is incredibly easy to use, too. Just double tap and the DJI Phantom 4 takes off; tap once more and it lands.
The end result? A drone that shoots fantastic 360-degree video and takes brilliant photographs. Less helicopter, more camera. All the hobbyists who are still buying cameras will no doubt be converting. And since consumers no longer have to worry so much about crashing the drone and the price point will continue to drop, consumers aside from hobbyists will also begin to purchase drones. There are already many photography niche drones in development like Lily and GoPro for outdoor enthusiasts.
Expanding Consumer Demand and the China Factor
The FAA has required U.S. citizens to register their drones since Dec. 21 of last year. In the ensuing two-plus months, more than 300,000 drones have been registered. Believe it or not, there are now more registered drones than piloted aircraft in the United States.
Though the market is still in its infancy, 40,000 drones were shipped to Chinese customers in the third quarter of 2015. While some U.S. consumers might have disposable income — some might even consider $1,399 for the Phantom 4 an “impulse buy” — the Chinese have shown they will spend on drones. The WSJ reported that DJI is opening its first 8,600 square foot flagship store in the Shenzhen shopping center, which will sell products that range from $500-$4,000. DJI is marketing by allowing consumers to touch and feel the product. Research suggests that 3.1 million drones will be sold in China in 2019 — quite the step up from the current sales figures. These forecasts are precisely why DJI recently raised an additional $75 million to boost its valuation to $8 billion.
So Where are the Early Stage Investment Opportunities?
Goldman Sachs estimates commercial drone sales market to be $20.6 billion and consumer to be $14 billion in the next five years. Even with all of this demand, early stage investors are not likely to invest in hardware or drones themselves, but rather in the services that drones provide. Why? Most drone hardware is available from China at minimal cost and the basic software is an open source in many cases, meaning that drone makers will face plenty of competition. On the other hand, the companies that adapt drones to spray crops, inspect buildings, pipes, rigs, do mapping, and other useful tasks will make money. Like the computer industry, making hardware is easily commoditized. Operating systems are becoming low margin. On the other hand, software and using software to solve a problem is high margin.
Near-term commercial demand is being driven by a variety of use cases in media and entertainment, journalism, agriculture, real estate and public safety, just to name a few. Because in many cases, it is not economically efficient for buyers to own and operate drones themselves, companies providing “drone as a service” businesses and tangential services could be useful investments.
Venture dollars have already poured into the industry. Airware, which has received venture funding itself and focuses on operating systems for drones, has now formed its own venture fund.
In precision agriculture, there have been many companies pursuing drones as a service models. For instance, Greensight is using custom drones and sensors to monitor turf grass for early signs of chemical needs, thereby lowering the cost for chemical companies that service large turf areas like golf courses.
For inspections, companies like Percepto are using computer vision for drones to reduce the cost of wind turbine inspections. Others are targeting oil and gas rigs and mining. The construction industry is being disrupted by drones offering superior and cheaper surveying such as Skycatch. In all of these instances, surveying is time-consuming and expensive, and can even be dangerous because of difficult terrain. A map is only as good as the number and accuracy of themeasurements taken. Drones are solving this problem.
Investing in Drone Protection
Drone maintenance is another area of interest. Like any other piece of machinery, drones need to be maintained, and aircraft maintenance is already a large industry. For example, companies like Robotic Skies have as many as 60 drone repair centers sprinkled across the globe. In a recent interview, the company’s CEO said Robotic Skies is not content with simply offering repair services; it plans to create a slew of value-adding services in the near future. These services will include training, data-capture and analysis, and custom component development, to name a few.
Drone insurance is another emerging industry. Drones can crash. From startup insurance brokers to major players like AIG, the niche industry will only grow larger as more and more drones take to the skies. Today’s policies mirror standard aviation policies but as usage grows, issues of operator safety, privacy, cyber security, property and access rights are likely to arise. On the commercial side, there is very little data on which insurers can accurately price risk, but this will change with more usage. On the consumer side, most homeowner policies cover the use of radio-controlled vehicles, and insurers can add a rider to extend to drones.
Then, there is drone security. We are seeing infrastructure plays on the defense side, which provide drone detection and response. Two companies specifically, (Dedrone, a European company, and DroneShield), are focusing on drone detection. Another company, Skysafe, is licensing technology to prevent malicious drones from entering stadiums, prisons, and smuggling drugs across the border.
In case you get injured by a drone, there is always Flirtey, which came out of Y Combinator. It was one of the first companies to do to a pilot test of a delivery within the U.S. They delivered medical devices or healthcare-related products about 3 miles.
There is also a shortage of pilots, so perhaps we will see companies that address this need. There are many other use cases that will create other markets.
Regulatory Risk
Thus far, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has moved somewhat slowly to create a regulatory framework for drone operations. The FAA missed its September 30, 2015 Congressional deadline to draw up rules for widespread use.
In order to fly commercially, prospective users must obtain a Section 333 exemption and Certificate of Authorization from the FAA as an exception to the blanket ban on commercial drone use. Still, operators are largely prohibited from flying in ways that deliver the greatest returns (i.e., more autonomously, beyond line-of-sight, over people, and at higher altitudes).
There have been around 4,000 exemptions issued thus far. According to CB Insights, as of July 2015, 44 percent of all the Section 333 exemptions have gone to film, photo, or video use cases, which include companies that use drones for movies and TV shows. Two other groups operating under this exception are artists and real estate agents trying to map a property. The second highest use case was in inspection and monitoring. Third is mapping and surveying, to understand construction zones, city planning, or general land and commercial construction. Fourth highest was precision agriculture.
Without a clear roadmap for regulation, drone manufacturers have been slow to develop key technologies that might not be compliant in subsequent years, even if these technologies might facilitate uptake, expand capabilities, and enhance safety today.
Of course, the most hyped use of commercial drones is delivery, where Amazon receives the most press in the U.S. and China S.F. Express is already using drones for logistics delivery. However, there are still many obstacles before we see this in mass. Already the FAA and NASA are actively recruiting work groups from the industry to solve the air traffic control issue.
So, how do investors make sense of this? Clearly, we are seeing more activity in this sector targeting real enterprise issues that are critical, but we need to keep close relationships with the regulators. WSJ may be correct that we have not seen the masses benefit yet, but there are areas of opportunity here to invest in the early stages. The sky’s the limit — let’s fly!
Image Credit: CC by Washington State House Republicans
